- Published
- 8 October 2026
- Last reviewed
- 8 October 2026
How to use these FAQs
Keep evidence connected to the claim, date and source so a reviewer can understand what it demonstrates.
Select a question to expand its answer. The first answer is open initially; each answer can be opened or closed independently. These are original RDE practical explanations. Any example described as fictional is a teaching scenario.
Common questions
What makes a record useful as evidence?
It should relate to the question being examined and have enough context to interpret it. Identify its source, date, relevant activity and any limitations. A fictional screenshot of an approval screen may show a displayed status, but not establish who authorised it. Ask what the record actually demonstrates before treating it as proof of a broader claim.
Is a screenshot always sufficient?
No. A screenshot may omit timing, identity, history or the route used to produce the display. Where appropriate, support it with an authorised system record, reference or explanation. Keep the original context available without sharing restricted data unnecessarily. Do not use a cropped image to imply that a complete process was checked when only one screen was observed.
How should I organise an evidence folder?
Use a consistent naming approach and an index connecting each record to the relevant review question. Include dates, versions and an owner for follow-up. Separate source material from your interpretation. For a fictional control review, the index might point to an approval record and explain which period it covers, instead of leaving the reviewer to search many attachments.
What should I do if evidence is missing?
Record the gap, explain which claim remains unsupported and agree a follow-up owner. Do not create a retrospective record that pretends to have existed earlier. A later explanation can be useful if it is accurately dated and labelled. Keep the distinction between “not found”, “not performed” and “not required” clear until the facts are established.
Can a sample prove the entire process works?
A sample provides evidence about the items examined within its method and limits. It does not automatically establish that every item or period behaved the same way. State how the sample was chosen and what was excluded. If the decision requires wider assurance, follow the review plan rather than extending a small observation into a universal claim.
How should evidence be shared and retained?
Follow the organisation’s access, retention and security requirements. Share only what the reviewer is authorised to receive, and keep sensitive material in the approved location. Record where a restricted source can be accessed instead of duplicating it everywhere. Do not assume that a review request overrides confidentiality, or that keeping every file forever improves traceability.
Put one answer into practice
Choose the question closest to your current task. Write one action in your own notes, identify the information or permission you need and set a review point. Use the related resources below to develop the task further. No response is submitted or stored by this page.
Sources and scope
The sources below provide relevant context and terminology. The examples, practical suggestions and wording are original RDE teaching material. Apply your organisation’s policies and the guidance relevant to your situation. Reviewed 8 October 2026. Author: Jefferson Otonbara Imgbi.
Cover image: AI-generated illustrative scene created specifically for this resource.